IQ Spring 2012: The Conference Issue - (Page 13)

traNsportatIoN report//state of the sector By Brandon J. Davis Best-vaLue procureMeNts have proven to be a valuable tool for awarding design-build transportation projects. In contrast to low-bid procurements, best-value gives public owners the flexibility to choose what they will evaluate in a proposal. Public owners generally understand that best-value procurements can stimulate innovation and improve project performance over the long term. Nevertheless, owners don’t always get the most value possible because they don’t fully explore the options available to them in the process. determining project-related goals: Before a public owner develops evaluation criteria, it should establish goals for the project, prioritize those goals and get buy-in from relevant parties. This will make the remainder of the evaluation process more effective. Importance of price vs. other factors: The first major decision owners typically make relates to the importance of price vs. all other factors. Generally the more weight an owner places on the price proposal, the greater the incentive for proposers to cut costs. In contrast, the more weight an owner allocates to all other evaluation factors, the proposer will be more likely to increase project quality and develop innovative solutions, which can be particularly beneficial for complex projects. Ultimately owners should look to the goals they set for the project to make this decision. all other evaluation factors: Design-build statutes often provide owners with latitude to determine what non-price proposal factors they will evaluate. Instead of being limited to evaluating proposed design concepts, owners can evaluate project schedules, aesthetics, project-management plans, maintenance of traffic, third-party impacts, quality-assurance and quality-control plans and a host of other items. Whether an owner should evaluate these items depends on the owner’s goals for the project. For example, if a proposed bridge will replace an existing bridge, expediting the opening of the new bridge may not be one of the owner’s main goals. As a result, the owner may not give the project schedule significant weight in the evaluation. When deciding upon what factors to evaluate, public owners should determine if there are project-related costs they will incur or save that are not reflected in the price proposal. Similarly, owners may consider evaluating how the proposals will affect the owner-provided right of way for the project, which can significantly impact the owner’s project-related costs and savings. take away: When owners set up best-value procurements, they should not simply follow precedent. Owners should spend time up front determining and prioritizing goals for the project and then fully explore what evaluation criteria and the weightings they could use to accomplish their goals. These steps will help ensure that owners get the most value possible out of their best-value procurements. BranDon J. DavIS IS a SEnIor aSSocIatE In noSSaMan LLp’S Infr a StrUctUrE pr actIcE GroUp In LoS anGELES. hE haS EXpErIEncE aS a KEY MEMBEr of thE LEGaL tEaM for thE procUrEMEnt anD IMpLEMEntatIon of SEvEraL hIGh-profILE DESIGn-BUILD anD pUBLIc-prIvatE partnErShIp proJEctS, IncLUDInG thE port of MIaMI tUnnEL anD I-595 proJEctS In fLorIDa. hE IS cUrrEntLY IS WorKInG on thE procUrEMEnt of thE GEr aLD DESMonD BrIDGE rEpLacEMEnt proJEct In LonG BEach, caLIf. dbia.org / TRANS REPORT spring//2012 13 getting the “Best value” from Best-value procurements http://www.dbia.org

Table of Contents for the Digital Edition of IQ Spring 2012: The Conference Issue

IQ Spring 2012: The Conference Issue

IQ Spring 2012: The Conference Issue - (Page C1)
IQ Spring 2012: The Conference Issue - (Page C2)
IQ Spring 2012: The Conference Issue - (Page 1)
IQ Spring 2012: The Conference Issue - (Page 2)
IQ Spring 2012: The Conference Issue - (Page 3)
IQ Spring 2012: The Conference Issue - (Page 4)
IQ Spring 2012: The Conference Issue - (Page 5)
IQ Spring 2012: The Conference Issue - (Page 6)
IQ Spring 2012: The Conference Issue - (Page 7)
IQ Spring 2012: The Conference Issue - (Page 8)
IQ Spring 2012: The Conference Issue - (Page 9)
IQ Spring 2012: The Conference Issue - (Page 10)
IQ Spring 2012: The Conference Issue - (Page 11)
IQ Spring 2012: The Conference Issue - (Page 12)
IQ Spring 2012: The Conference Issue - (Page 13)
IQ Spring 2012: The Conference Issue - (Page 14)
IQ Spring 2012: The Conference Issue - (Page 15)
IQ Spring 2012: The Conference Issue - (Page 16)
IQ Spring 2012: The Conference Issue - (Page 17)
IQ Spring 2012: The Conference Issue - (Page 18)
IQ Spring 2012: The Conference Issue - (Page 19)
IQ Spring 2012: The Conference Issue - (Page 20)
IQ Spring 2012: The Conference Issue - (Page 21)
IQ Spring 2012: The Conference Issue - (Page 22)
IQ Spring 2012: The Conference Issue - (Page 23)
IQ Spring 2012: The Conference Issue - (Page 24)
IQ Spring 2012: The Conference Issue - (Page 25)
IQ Spring 2012: The Conference Issue - (Page 26)
IQ Spring 2012: The Conference Issue - (Page 27)
IQ Spring 2012: The Conference Issue - (Page 28)
IQ Spring 2012: The Conference Issue - (Page 29)
IQ Spring 2012: The Conference Issue - (Page 30)
IQ Spring 2012: The Conference Issue - (Page 31)
IQ Spring 2012: The Conference Issue - (Page 32)
IQ Spring 2012: The Conference Issue - (Page C3)
IQ Spring 2012: The Conference Issue - (Page C4)
http://staging.nxtbook.com/ygsreprints/DBIA/g32384_dbia_spring2013
http://staging.nxtbook.com/ygsreprints/DBIA/g30201_dbia_winter2012
http://staging.nxtbook.com/ygsreprints/DBIA/g27498_dbia_iq_fall2012
http://staging.nxtbook.com/ygsreprints/DBIA/g27263_dbia_iq_summer2012
http://staging.nxtbook.com/ygsreprints/DBIA/g27412dbia_iq_spr12
http://staging.nxtbook.com/ygsreprints/DBIA/g24065_dbiaiqwinter11
http://staging.nxtbook.com/ygsreprints/DBIA/g21862_dbia_fall_11
http://staging.nxtbook.com/ygsreprints/DBIA/dbianxtbook_summer_11
http://staging.nxtbook.com/ygsreprints/DBIA/g18240_dbia_spring2011a
http://www.nxtbookMEDIA.com